tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15084382.post4580990910275918960..comments2024-02-13T07:14:35.133-08:00Comments on Ken's Blog: AutoScaling Amazon SQS Queue ProcessorsKen Weinerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12369783173503766970noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15084382.post-77402300217271508632017-09-06T05:29:14.672-07:002017-09-06T05:29:14.672-07:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05678989587157520227noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15084382.post-55381381507747146392016-11-21T02:17:17.981-08:002016-11-21T02:17:17.981-08:00Thanks Ken for your post.
Do you know if there is...Thanks Ken for your post.<br /><br />Do you know if there is a way to terminate instances based on more than a SQS? For instance, imagine I have sqs1 with 500 visible messages and sqs2 with 0 visible messages.<br />Then, obviously, I don't want to terminate instance until both queues are 0 (AND conditional).<br />I did not find a way how can I do this conjugation. Do you know if is it possible?<br /><br />Thanks Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15084382.post-14857494046120996592016-02-15T14:31:28.677-08:002016-02-15T14:31:28.677-08:00Don't think you can avoid that. Your processin...Don't think you can avoid that. Your processing app has to be stateless I guess, the message in progress will go back in the queue automagically after its invisibility timeout. StuartB__https://www.blogger.com/profile/05059147221267197871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15084382.post-81808595160661366182013-09-22T13:40:28.057-07:002013-09-22T13:40:28.057-07:00Hey Ken, thanks for the info! I have a question ab...Hey Ken, thanks for the info! I have a question about the scale down procedure. How do you prevent Amazon from killing a server that is currently processing a SQS message?Myles Megyesihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06006852692314796110noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15084382.post-44451010032541754122012-09-11T18:37:53.820-07:002012-09-11T18:37:53.820-07:00Exactly what I was looking for. Thanks!Exactly what I was looking for. Thanks!Jeff Rhinesnoreply@blogger.com